TV Electorate
"These dramas capitalize on psychologists' knowledge of the powerful--and sometimes scary--influences television can have on children and adults." It is these kind of results that so many people find compelling. If only the incredible power of TV could be harnessed for good! Unfortunately shows about people acting rationally and sensibly do not make good drama. The soap operas described in the above link, in addition to teaching safe sex, also include the standard soap opera fare, people (who happen to be beautiful and rich) acting badly.
Typical of soap operas, and much of TV drama is 'indirect aggression'. "They successfully spread rumours, damage relationships, distort reality, and destroy the reputations..." Sound familiar? Could this help explain the public's tolerance for political "dirty tricks" and lack of ethics?
Could this lack of ethics on TV also help explain a 30 year increase in cheating? And a 10 year youth ethics decline? Note: ethics declines have real world consequences.
What’s on TV Tonight? Humiliation to the Point of Suicide
* * * * *
Scientists have concluded that exposure to violent TV does indeed lead to more aggressive thoughts, attitudes and actions (see Aggression & TV). So the fact that an "average American child will see 200,000 violent acts and 16,000 murders on TV by age 18" means that TV has created a more aggressive electorate. Could this also help explain the fact that the homicide rate nearly doubled from the mid 1960's to the late 1970's. In reaction to this huge crime increase, the public supported policies that have led to a 335% increase in the incarceration rate (pdf). This has brought the crime back down to the early 1960s levels, but the United States now has the highest incarceration rate in the entire world (pdf) - see also The New York Times (April 2008)
Four years ago, Bhutan, the fabled Himalayan Shangri-la, became the last nation on earth to introduce television. Suddenly a culture, barely changed in centuries, was bombarded by 46 cable channels. And all too soon came Bhutan's first crime wave - murder, fraud, drug offences.
* * * * *
A more aggressive electorate, would also logically lead to increased popularity of more aggressive ideologies and policies.
"This study examines the relationship between young people's exposure to media violence and their aggressive political opinions (APO), which were defined as support for positions that involve forceful resolution to social or political issues."
* * * * *
TV Legitimizing Torture and disregarding civil rights: "Sadly, for decades the media model for a hero has been the rogue cop who lies, cheats, steals, bashes heads and generally trashes the rights and often the bodies of guilty and innocent alike, to catch some vile thug. From James Bond, to the Beverly Hills Cop, to the latest episode of "Law and Order," media cops have little use for such archaic concepts as "constitutional rights," "your home is your castle," or "innocent until proven guilty."
"...a sly male-revenge-fantasy film in more ways than one."
Dying and living in 'COPS' America
* * * * *
Regarding the 'mean-world' syndrome, a quote from Television and its Viewers: Cultivation Theory and Research (1999) page 49: "Gerbner and Gross reasoned that a heightened and widespread sense of fear, danger and apprehension can bolster demands for greater security; this in turn can mean greater legitimacy of the authority that can promise to meet those demands, creating conditions highly conductive to repression and undermining support for civil liberties. It can also mean greater acceptance of the use of violence as an appropriate means to solve disputes of international policy... or greater habituation to violence and passivity in the face of injustice."
* * * * *
This study shows a link between TV watching and consumerism. Could this help explain the public's national spending spree?
"The real concerns of yesterday's poor have become the imagined concerns of today's rich," said Dr Hamilton. "This 'deprivation syndrome' induces politicians to distort policy to reduce the burden of taxation and increase public payments to wealthy households."
"Frey found that heavy TV viewers were both more anxious and more greedy than were light viewers on the same incomes. They were also more scared about the outside world."
* * * * *
With Americans spending over 4 hours in front of the TV every day, and with the fact that TV models aggression (both direct and indirect), and that TV encourages the contract effect, is it any wonder that Americans are far more socially isolated today than they were two decades ago? Social isolation leads to stress. Could this help explain a stressed-out public?
Slower brainwaves, engendered by TV, bring on a feeling of passivity. Also this study shows how TV encourages apathy. Democracy does not work with a passive and apathetic populace. See Brainwaves & TV
|